Criterions

Up YOUR CHOICE Testament Criterions
by Applied Personal Science Dr. Peter Meier, Bachmattstr. 23, CH-8048 Zürich, Global Identity, Positionierung

Criterions for considering Life- through Task-Fulfillment


February 4, 2020: Start of the US-American polarizing Presidential Election
Circus with Trump-bashing versus "America First" in the Age of Disruption.

Finally an overview is made public; to the utter disgust of the zeitgeist and its various mutually disrupting trend riders! It is about what the the 3 science faculties organized under OPTION I (temple psycho-arts#0 > the "human" sciences#2 of the palace government/law ruling > people#1 as sheople. The former two are united

  1. to remain disruptingly convinced of respecting the hierarchy, top from the arts#0 down to formatting the "humanities#2", e.g. the Pope crowning the Emperor Napoleon, as a temple-spin-doctored convincing zero-sum power game of the ruling of people and

  2. to outcast those who attempt to use, the thus made missing Applied Personal Science, in any OPTION II personally relevant way, as their a-conscious O-orientation for their X-being. Against such stumbling blocks for the ZG-zeitgeist, the INtellect up to undermining RELigions, and even hard sciences, provide soft and hard ways to fight against, what in fact are the cornerstones of OPTION II , which can only be  experienced in 1-to-1 emo-syncing relationships, but which OPTION I tries to capture in subtly insubstantial pre-trans-trapping vicious circles:

Judge the way you want to go about treating the fruits of the tree of intellect based sciences with your innate purpose, to either fulfill your innate OPTION II, or to allow its OPTION I mutation into a hidden agenda behind a mass-attractive fig leaf:

Emotional-Synchronization  versus  personally-neutral INtellect
Scientifically concrete Know-How  versus  "God" RELigions and Ideologies		ESINKHREL
1) Insightful support of substantial lifefulfillment beyond the zeitgeist

OK

NOKNOKOK
2) by valuing the relationship truths in walking the talk with re(solutions).OKNOKOKOK
3) Relaxing in the substantial essence of those concerned to go beyond brands towardsOKNOKNOKNOK
4) Opening up a maximal perspective in the M-manipulating work/life balanceOKNOKOKOK
5) with concepts congruent to perceptions of the potential for synergy.OKNOKOKNOK
6) Balancing the innate feeling/O-orientation of those personally concerned byOKOKNOKOK
7) addressing the real necessities with reproducible profiles andOKNOKOKOK
8) supporting the real-self justifying thinking.OKNOKNOKNOK
M/O Score (0/8 ES serves the personally-relevant PURPOSE
       of using IN-KH-REL MEANS for Life- through Task-Fulfillment)		0/87/14/43/5

At the Crossroad, ready for Reverse Engineering, i.e. L3-Refraoming of the OPTION I wordy Lego/Cargo-Cult with personally elevant open-ended generative principles?

 

© Copyright 2018, Dr. Peter Meier, Blog, Version: 21.08.2023 Privacy Policy Terms Attention Q&A
Gretchenfrage, Hinweis, für Dich,  Anfragen:

My work ultimately aims at universities and media to get reframed by still real people beyond the zeitgeist from Courts of intellectual idolatry to LifeFulfilling Platforms; the sheople they mentally condition, to real human beings aware of their OPTION II: Lebenserfüllung